PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SPYV having a 10.14% return and IVV slightly lower at 10.13%. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.92%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


SPYV

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.68%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
11.92%
ALL TIME*
7.87%

IVV

1D
0.69%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.11%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.36B$3.31B$5.91B
$129.05M$117.43M$146.49M

SPYV vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
10.14%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and IVV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.84

The correlation between SPYV and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYV vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYV
IVV

Technology

21.7%
37.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
12.5%

Healthcare

12.2%
9.4%

Industrials

10.9%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
4.8%

Energy

6.6%
3.3%

Utilities

4.5%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
9.6%

Technology

SPYV
21.7%
IVV
37.2%

Financial Services

SPYV
15.1%
IVV
12.5%

Healthcare

SPYV
12.2%
IVV
9.4%

Industrials

SPYV
10.9%
IVV
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYV
10.6%
IVV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPYV
8.8%
IVV
4.8%

Energy

SPYV
6.6%
IVV
3.3%

Utilities

SPYV
4.5%
IVV
2.6%

Basic Materials

SPYV
3.3%
IVV
1.8%

Real Estate

SPYV
3.3%
IVV
1.9%

Communication Services

SPYV
2.9%
IVV
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYV vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYVIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.21

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

9.43

+2.85

SPYV vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-55.25%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-8.89%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-18.75%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

-24.53%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

-33.90%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.41%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-10.72%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.09%

-0.48%

Volatility

SPYV vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.72%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

3.52%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

10.18%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.99%

12.89%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

17.01%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.06%

-1.18%

SPYV vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYV vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.69%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and IVV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to SPYV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.11% vs 11.92% for SPYV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 11.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.03% for IVV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer