PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. QQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.


SPYT

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
9.70%12.41%4.89%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.57%17.24%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and QQA is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

0.88

The correlation between SPYT and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYT vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
QQA

Technology

36.2%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

8.1%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

SPYT
36.2%
QQA
53.8%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.9%
QQA
0.2%

Communication Services

SPYT
10.9%
QQA
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.1%
QQA
12.3%

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
QQA
4.2%

Industrials

SPYT
8.1%
QQA
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.9%
QQA
7.7%

Energy

SPYT
3.5%
QQA
0.6%

Utilities

SPYT
2.3%
QQA
1.4%

Real Estate

SPYT
1.9%
QQA
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.8%
QQA
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYTQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.70

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

16.59

-3.00

SPYT vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYT and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYTQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.57

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.18

-0.09

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and QQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-19.73%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-8.76%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.10%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-2.44%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.95%

-0.23%

Volatility

SPYT vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) is 2.54%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that SPYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.91%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

9.68%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

12.59%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

18.27%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

18.27%

-3.47%

SPYT vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than QQA's 9.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
20.73%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SPYT and QQA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SPYT (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYT dropped -18.25% vs QQA's -19.73%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 23.29% for SPYT. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPYT has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 23.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SPYT.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.29% for QQA.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and QQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer