PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


SPYT

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
9.70%12.41%12.94%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%4.13%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and BUCK is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.11

SPYT vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
BUCK

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SPYT
36.2%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

SPYT
11.9%
BUCK
100.0%

Communication Services

SPYT
10.9%
BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.1%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
BUCK

-

Industrials

SPYT
8.1%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.9%
BUCK

-

Energy

SPYT
3.5%
BUCK

-

Utilities

SPYT
2.3%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

SPYT
1.9%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.8%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYTBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.54

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

6.11

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

32.31

-18.72

SPYT vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYT and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYTBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.54

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.47

-0.39

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-5.43%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-1.31%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.04%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-0.49%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.25%

+1.47%

Volatility

SPYT vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that SPYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

0.70%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

1.53%

+6.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

3.14%

+7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

3.49%

+11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

3.49%

+11.31%

SPYT vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
20.73%21.40%17.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and BUCK have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYT has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYT dropped -18.25% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, SPYT leads with 23.29% vs 7.95% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYT has performed better with a 23.29% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SPYT.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 20.73%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

SPYT is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer