PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


SPYT

1D
-0.68%
1M
3.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.51%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
9.70%6.32%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and AMDW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.54

SPYT vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
AMDW

Technology

36.2%
28.6%

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SPYT
36.2%
AMDW
28.6%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.9%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

SPYT
10.9%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.1%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
AMDW

-

Industrials

SPYT
8.1%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.9%
AMDW

-

Energy

SPYT
3.5%
AMDW

-

Utilities

SPYT
2.3%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

SPYT
1.9%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.8%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYTAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

SPYT vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYTAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

4.83

-3.75

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-34.64%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-14.66%

+12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

Volatility

SPYT vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

81.56%

-70.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

81.56%

-66.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

81.56%

-66.76%

SPYT vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.73%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%0.00%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
20.73%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and AMDW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 20.73% for SPYT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer