PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.


SPYT

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
7.21%
6M
6.55%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
7.21%6.32%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
176.01%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and AMDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.56

SPYT vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
AMDW

Technology

38.4%
27.8%

Financial Services

11.0%

-

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

SPYT
38.4%
AMDW
27.8%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.0%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

SPYT
10.8%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.0%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
AMDW

-

Industrials

SPYT
7.9%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.6%
AMDW

-

Energy

SPYT
3.2%
AMDW

-

Utilities

SPYT
2.1%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

SPYT
1.8%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.7%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYTAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

SPYT vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-34.64%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-7.20%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-14.25%

+12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

Volatility

SPYT vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

83.41%

-71.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

83.41%

-68.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

83.41%

-68.51%

SPYT vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.21%, less than AMDW's 37.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.14%34.78%0.00%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
21.21%21.40%17.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and AMDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 21.21% for SPYT.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer