SPYQ vs. TARK
SPYQ (Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF) and TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPYQ returned 51.99% vs 58.98% for TARK. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TARK.
Performance
SPYQ vs. TARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than TARK's -1.67% return.
SPYQ
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 18.82%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 51.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYQ vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF | 18.82% | 26.22% | 4.76% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 41.00% | 42.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYQ and TARK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SPYQ and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYQ vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank
SPYQ
TARK
SPYQ vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYQ | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 0.83 | +1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.82 | 1.50 | +1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.11 | +1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 2.19 | +10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYQ | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 0.83 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.07 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
SPYQ vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum TARK drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and TARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYQ | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.88% | -77.82% | +41.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.70% | -57.57% | +38.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -35.30% | +35.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -51.00% | +46.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 29.21% | -25.05% |
Volatility
SPYQ vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) is 5.11%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 17.93%. This indicates that SPYQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYQ | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 17.93% | -12.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 50.05% | -31.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 71.71% | -47.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 90.60% | -55.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 90.60% | -55.96% |
SPYQ vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYQ vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison
SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TARK's 30.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SPYQ Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYQ and TARK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TARK has higher volatility (17.93%) compared to SPYQ (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs TARK's -77.82%.
On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 58.98% vs 51.99% for SPYQ. On fees, TARK is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, SPYQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 58.98% return vs 51.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TARK is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 0.14% for SPYQ.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 1.15% for TARK.
SPYQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYQ and TARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer