PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYQ vs. TARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYQ vs. TARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYQ achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly higher than TARK's -1.67% return.


SPYQ

1D
0.26%
1M
9.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
18.88%
1Y
51.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TARK

1D
-3.51%
1M
6.42%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-5.56%
1Y
58.98%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYQ vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
18.82%26.22%4.76%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-1.67%41.00%42.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYQ and TARK is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.76

The correlation between SPYQ and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYQ vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYQ
SPYQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPYQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYQ vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYQTARKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

0.83

+1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

1.50

+1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.17

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.11

+1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

2.19

+10.62

SPYQ vs. TARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the TARK Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYQ and TARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYQTARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

0.83

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

-0.07

+0.97

Drawdowns

SPYQ vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYQ drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum TARK drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYQ and TARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYQTARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-77.82%

+41.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.70%

-57.57%

+38.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.30%

+35.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-51.00%

+46.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

29.21%

-25.05%

Volatility

SPYQ vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF (SPYQ) is 5.11%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 17.93%. This indicates that SPYQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYQTARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

17.93%

-12.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

50.05%

-31.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.73%

71.71%

-47.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.64%

90.60%

-55.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.64%

90.60%

-55.96%

SPYQ vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TARK's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYQ vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison

SPYQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TARK's 30.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SPYQ
Tradr 2X Long SPY Quarterly ETF
0.14%0.17%0.00%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
30.51%30.00%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYQ and TARK have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (17.93%) compared to SPYQ (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYQ dropped -35.88% vs TARK's -77.82%.

On 1-year performance, TARK leads with 58.98% vs 51.99% for SPYQ. On fees, TARK is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, SPYQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TARK has performed better with a 58.98% return vs 51.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TARK is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SPYQ.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 0.14% for SPYQ.

Their fees differ too: 1.30% for SPYQ and 1.15% for TARK.

SPYQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYQ and TARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer