PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed VOOV with an annualized return of 15.39%, while VOOV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.87% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.47%
6M
12.81%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
15.39%
ALL TIME*
11.32%

VOOV

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.81%
6M
7.22%
YTD
11.81%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
11.60%
10Y*
11.87%
ALL TIME*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$860.67M$925.17M$1.11B
$18.42M$15.43M$15.46M

SPYM vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
13.55%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
11.81%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and VOOV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.81

The correlation between SPYM and VOOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
VOOV

Technology

38.5%
21.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.2%

Industrials

8.4%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.8%

Energy

3.0%
6.6%

Utilities

2.2%
4.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.6%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
VOOV
21.7%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.6%
VOOV
14.9%

Communication Services

SPYM
9.9%
VOOV
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.5%
VOOV
10.5%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.9%
VOOV
12.2%

Industrials

SPYM
8.4%
VOOV
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.5%
VOOV
8.8%

Energy

SPYM
3.0%
VOOV
6.6%

Utilities

SPYM
2.2%
VOOV
4.4%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
VOOV
3.3%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
VOOV
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYM vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYMVOOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.53

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

13.60

-2.03

SPYM vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-37.31%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.27%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-17.55%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-18.10%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-37.31%

+3.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.17%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-3.81%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.62%

+0.46%

Volatility

SPYM vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.70%. This indicates that SPYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

2.70%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

7.20%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

9.88%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

14.36%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

16.89%

+1.14%

SPYM vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VOOV's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VOOV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.64%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and VOOV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to VOOV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.39% vs 11.87% for VOOV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.07% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer