SPYM vs. SCHP
SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYM returned 15.40%/yr vs 2.53%/yr for SCHP. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
SPYM vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 15.40%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.40%
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.53%
SPYM vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.75% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.96% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYM and SCHP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.05 |
The correlation between SPYM and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYM vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYM
SCHP
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPYM
SCHP
-
Financial Services
SPYM
SCHP
Communication Services
SPYM
SCHP
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYM
SCHP
Healthcare
SPYM
SCHP
-
Industrials
SPYM
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYM
SCHP
-
Energy
SPYM
SCHP
-
Utilities
SPYM
SCHP
-
Real Estate
SPYM
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
SPYM
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYM vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
SPYM
SCHP
SPYM vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYM | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.50 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 7.59 | +5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYM | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.47 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.17 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.45 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.50 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SPYM vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYM | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -14.26% | -40.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -1.93% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.72% | -4.48% | -14.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -14.26% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -14.26% | -19.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -0.89% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -3.93% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.63% | +1.29% |
Volatility
SPYM vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that SPYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYM | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 1.00% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 2.24% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 3.29% | +8.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 6.12% | +10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 5.59% | +12.43% |
SPYM vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYM vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.01% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYM and SCHP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYM has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.40% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.03% for SCHP.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer