PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 15.40%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.75%
6M
8.78%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.40%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.75%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SCHP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between SPYM and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SCHP

Technology

38.5%

-

Financial Services

11.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

SPYM
11.1%
SCHP
0.0%

Communication Services

SPYM
10.6%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.9%
SCHP
100.0%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.4%
SCHP

-

Industrials

SPYM
7.6%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.6%
SCHP

-

Energy

SPYM
3.2%
SCHP

-

Utilities

SPYM
2.5%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYMSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.50

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

7.59

+5.38

SPYM vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYMSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.47

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.17

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.45

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.50

+0.11

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-14.26%

-40.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-1.93%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-4.48%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-14.26%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-14.26%

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-0.89%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-3.93%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.63%

+1.29%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that SPYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.00%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

2.24%

+7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

3.29%

+8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

6.12%

+10.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

5.59%

+12.43%

SPYM vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and SCHP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.40% vs 2.53% for SCHP. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for SCHP.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.03% for SCHP.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer