PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.


SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-7.49%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and GLDM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.08

The correlation between SPYM and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYM vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
GLDM

Technology

38.5%

-

Financial Services

11.1%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
100.0%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
GLDM

-

Financial Services

SPYM
11.1%
GLDM

-

Communication Services

SPYM
10.6%
GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.9%
GLDM

-

Healthcare

SPYM
8.4%
GLDM

-

Industrials

SPYM
7.6%
GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.6%
GLDM

-

Energy

SPYM
3.2%
GLDM

-

Utilities

SPYM
2.5%
GLDM

-

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
GLDM
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYMGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.24

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

1.63

+1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.70

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.76

4.23

+10.53

SPYM vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYMGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.24

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

1.04

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.02

-0.40

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-21.63%

-32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-19.14%

+10.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-19.14%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-20.92%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-17.65%

+16.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-6.22%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

7.69%

-5.78%

Volatility

SPYM vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 2.83%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.47%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

22.99%

-14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

26.39%

-14.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

17.91%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

16.85%

+1.15%

SPYM vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and GLDM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 13.91% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while GLDM is Gold. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.10% for GLDM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer