SPYM vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SPYM returned 24.91% vs -39.41% for FBTC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPYM charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

SPYM vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -27.63% return.

SPYM

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 8.75%
• 6M: 8.78%
• 1Y: 24.91%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 15.40%

FBTC

• 1D: 5.17%
• 1M: -20.97%
• YTD: -27.63%
• 6M: -30.29%
• 1Y: -39.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	8.75%	17.79%	24.68%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-27.63%	-6.56%	99.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and FBTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

SPYM vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYM	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	-0.90	+2.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	-1.24	+4.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.86	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	-0.76	+3.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	-1.36	+14.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYM vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYM	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	-0.90	+2.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.27	+0.34

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYM	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.46%	-52.07%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-52.07%	+43.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-49.59%	+46.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-16.18%	+9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	28.93%	-27.01%

Volatility

SPYM vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.72%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYM	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	11.77%	-8.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	34.55%	-25.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.07%	44.17%	-32.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.84%	50.26%	-33.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	50.26%	-32.24%

SPYM vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPYM vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.02%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYM and FBTC in my portfolio?

SPYM and FBTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYM or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to SPYM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs FBTC's -52.07%.

Which ETF is better, SPYM or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, SPYM leads with 24.91% vs -39.41% for FBTC. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYM or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 24.91% return vs -39.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYM or FBTC?

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYM or FBTC?

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between SPYM and FBTC?

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while FBTC tracks Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.