PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.53% return.


SPYH

1D
0.69%
1M
0.68%
6M
4.69%
YTD
5.96%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.88%

PEPS

1D
0.81%
1M
0.80%
6M
8.59%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.31K$5.85K$15.49K
$472.46K$589.47K$594.95K

SPYH vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
5.96%20.01%
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
10.53%25.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and PEPS is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.98

The correlation between SPYH and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYH vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYHPEPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.31

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

10.10

+0.04

SPYH vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-21.26%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-9.80%

+3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.66%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-2.67%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

2.24%

-0.89%

Volatility

SPYH vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 2.67%, while Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.85%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

11.00%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

14.21%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

18.11%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

18.11%

-5.94%

SPYH vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.92%1.00%0.17%
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.71%5.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPYH and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PEPS has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SPYH (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 24.79% vs 14.86% for SPYH. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 24.79% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.10% for PEPS.

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer