PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYH vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYH vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYH achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 7.09% return.


SPYH

1D
0.69%
1M
0.68%
6M
4.69%
YTD
5.96%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.88%

IVVW

1D
0.65%
1M
1.31%
6M
6.25%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.59M$1.91M$2.60M
$472.46K$589.47K$594.95K

SPYH vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
5.96%20.01%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
7.09%14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYH and IVVW is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.87

The correlation between SPYH and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYH vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYH
IVVW

Technology

38.1%
36.9%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.5%

Communication Services

10.0%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
8.9%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.4%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

SPYH
38.1%
IVVW
36.9%

Financial Services

SPYH
11.7%
IVVW
12.5%

Communication Services

SPYH
10.0%
IVVW
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYH
9.3%
IVVW
8.9%

Healthcare

SPYH
9.1%
IVVW
9.4%

Industrials

SPYH
8.1%
IVVW
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYH
4.8%
IVVW
4.8%

Energy

SPYH
3.1%
IVVW
3.4%

Utilities

SPYH
2.4%
IVVW
2.6%

Real Estate

SPYH
1.9%
IVVW
2.0%

Basic Materials

SPYH
1.7%
IVVW
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYH vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYH vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYHIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.02

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

15.69

-5.56

SPYH vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYH and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYH vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYH drawdown since its inception was -7.22%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYH and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYHIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-16.79%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-5.81%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.11%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.68%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

1.12%

+0.23%

Volatility

SPYH vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) is 2.67%, while iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that SPYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYHIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.90%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

7.28%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

8.56%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

12.56%

-0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.17%

12.56%

-0.39%

SPYH vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYH vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, less than IVVW's 19.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.01%18.55%13.72%
SPYH
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.71%5.54%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYH and IVVW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVVW has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SPYH (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYH dropped -7.22% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 18.56% vs 14.86% for SPYH. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 14.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.01%, compared with 7.71% for SPYH.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for SPYH and 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYH and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer