PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYC achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


SPYC

1D
-0.84%
1M
5.51%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.63%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
7.59%15.31%22.57%23.98%-25.65%29.26%9.10%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%10.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYC and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020

0.94

The correlation between SPYC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYC
BBUS

Technology

35.6%
37.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
10.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.1%

Industrials

8.3%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

SPYC
35.6%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

SPYC
11.8%
BBUS
10.8%

Communication Services

SPYC
11.2%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYC
10.1%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

SPYC
8.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

SPYC
8.3%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPYC
4.9%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

SPYC
3.5%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

SPYC
2.4%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

SPYC
1.9%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

SPYC
1.8%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYC
SPYC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYCBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.00

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

13.76

-10.10

SPYC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYC Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYCBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.33

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.79

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.84

-0.19

Drawdowns

SPYC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYC drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYCBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-35.35%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.47%

-9.21%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.81%

-19.01%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.51%

-25.46%

-3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.74%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-5.46%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.00%

+2.49%

Volatility

SPYC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF (SPYC) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that SPYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYCBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

2.88%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

8.96%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

11.87%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

17.03%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

19.59%

+0.06%

SPYC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYC has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SPYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
SPYC
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
0.87%0.89%1.02%1.76%1.34%1.01%0.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPYC and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYC has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYC dropped -28.51% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 9.87% for SPYC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SPYC.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.87% for SPYC.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SPYC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer