SPYA vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SPYA (Twin Oak Endure ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. SPYA is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYA returned 17.32% vs 37.85% for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SPYA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYA achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

SPYA

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 5.38%
• 1Y: 17.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 37.85%
• 3Y*: 15.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	5.79%	11.69%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYA and ISCMF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

SPYA vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYA

SPYA Risk / Return Rank: 45
SPYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SPYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SPYA Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SPYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SPYA Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 85
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPYA	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.05	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	3.74	-1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.53	-1.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	6.69	-4.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.18	15.39	-8.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYA and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPYA	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	2.05	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.45	+1.14

Drawdowns

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYA drawdown since its inception was -9.51%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYA	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.51%	-25.42%	+15.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.51%	-5.69%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-5.26%	+2.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-13.41%	+11.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.46%	-0.04%

Volatility

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) is 3.66%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that SPYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYA	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	7.14%	-3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	15.90%	-7.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	18.53%	-7.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.39%	14.36%	-2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.39%	14.36%	-2.97%

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYA vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	0.35%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYA and ISCMF in my portfolio?

SPYA and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYA or ISCMF?

ISCMF has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to SPYA (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYA dropped -9.51% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, SPYA or ISCMF?

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 37.85% vs 17.32% for SPYA. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SPYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYA or ISCMF?

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 17.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYA or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SPYA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYA or ISCMF?

SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

What is the main difference between SPYA and ISCMF?

SPYA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SPYA and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.