PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYA vs. TOAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYA vs. TOAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYA achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than TOAK's 1.32% return.


SPYA

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.09%
YTD
8.05%
6M
7.32%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOAK

1D
0.03%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.55%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYA vs. TOAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPYA
Twin Oak Endure ETF
8.05%11.69%
TOAK
Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF
1.32%2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYA and TOAK is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYA vs. TOAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYA

TOAK
TOAK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TOAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TOAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOAK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYA vs. TOAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPYA vs. TOAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYATOAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.87

1.82

+0.05

Drawdowns

SPYA vs. TOAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYA drawdown since its inception was -9.51%, which is greater than TOAK's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYA and TOAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYATOAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

-1.81%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-1.81%

-7.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.72%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.10%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

Volatility

SPYA vs. TOAK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYATOAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.15%

2.92%

+8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

2.22%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.15%

2.22%

+8.93%

SPYA vs. TOAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TOAK's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYA vs. TOAK - Dividend Comparison

SPYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
SPYA
Twin Oak Endure ETF
0.35%0.37%
TOAK
Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYA and TOAK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, SPYA leads with 20.68% vs 3.70% for TOAK. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYA has performed better with a 20.68% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SPYA.

SPYA has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.

SPYA is categorized as Equity Hedged, while TOAK is Multistrategy. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SPYA and 0.25% for TOAK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYA and TOAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer