PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.27%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.


SPY

1D
0.23%
1M
0.22%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.75%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.27%

COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.70%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY and COST is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 1993

0.49

The correlation between SPY and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.98

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

-0.22

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

-0.51

+13.44

SPY vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

-0.18

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.98

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.02

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

SPY vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-53.39%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-15.38%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-20.74%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-31.40%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-31.40%

-2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-10.93%

+8.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-13.36%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

7.15%

-5.23%

Volatility

SPY vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) is 3.72%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that SPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

7.71%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

14.53%

-5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

18.79%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

22.71%

-5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

21.95%

-3.99%

Dividends

SPY vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPY and COST have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to SPY (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs COST's -53.39%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer