PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXV vs. RSPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXV vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXV achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than RSPU's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXV has outperformed RSPU with an annualized return of 15.96%, while RSPU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.


SPXV

1D
-0.64%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
8.39%
6M
7.18%
1Y
22.26%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
15.96%

RSPU

1D
1.09%
1M
1.74%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.00%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXV vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
8.39%18.40%28.02%30.71%-20.47%28.37%18.99%33.58%-3.81%17.01%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
10.10%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXV and RSPU is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.30

The correlation between SPXV and RSPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXV vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXV
RSPU

Technology

42.6%

-

Financial Services

12.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

11.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%

-

Industrials

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.3%
99.6%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

SPXV
42.6%
RSPU

-

Financial Services

SPXV
12.1%
RSPU
0.4%

Communication Services

SPXV
11.6%
RSPU

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXV
10.8%
RSPU

-

Industrials

SPXV
8.5%
RSPU

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXV
4.9%
RSPU

-

Energy

SPXV
3.4%
RSPU

-

Utilities

SPXV
2.3%
RSPU
99.6%

Real Estate

SPXV
2.0%
RSPU

-

Basic Materials

SPXV
1.8%
RSPU

-

Healthcare

SPXV

-

RSPU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXV vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXV
SPXV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXV vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXVRSPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.07

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

4.57

+5.62

SPXV vs. RSPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the RSPU Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXV and RSPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXV vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXV drawdown since its inception was -34.34%, smaller than the maximum RSPU drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXV and RSPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXVRSPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.34%

-48.08%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-8.46%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.89%

-16.27%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-21.86%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.34%

-36.85%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-2.48%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-7.84%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

3.82%

-1.63%

Volatility

SPXV vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF (SPXV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXVRSPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

5.01%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

11.17%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

14.12%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

16.90%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

19.12%

-1.05%

SPXV vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXV vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison

SPXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than RSPU's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.49%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%
SPXV
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Health Care ETF
0.92%0.97%1.12%1.27%1.67%1.11%1.45%1.58%1.89%1.57%2.66%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXV and RSPU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXV has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to RSPU (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXV dropped -34.34% vs RSPU's -48.08%.

On 10-year performance, SPXV leads with 15.96% vs 9.85% for RSPU. On fees, SPXV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXV has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.92% for SPXV.

SPXV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPU is Utilities Equities. SPXV tracks S&P 500 Ex-Health Care Index, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXV and 0.40% for RSPU.

SPXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXV and RSPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer