SPXU vs. XDSQ
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXU is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXU returned -34.89%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for XDSQ. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.62% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -25.62%
- 6M
- -25.04%
- 1Y
- -48.96%
- 3Y*
- -43.02%
- 5Y*
- -34.89%
- 10Y*
- -41.95%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -25.62% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -45.63% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.80% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and XDSQ is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | -0.94 |
The correlation between SPXU and XDSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
XDSQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
XDSQ
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Communication Services
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Energy
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Healthcare
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Industrials
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Real Estate
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Technology
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Utilities
SPXU
-
XDSQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
XDSQ
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.32 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 1.67 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 7.97 | -9.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.39 | 1.52 | -2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 | 0.65 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.84 | 0.69 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -26.06% | -73.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.82% | -9.60% | -41.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -19.15% | -65.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -26.06% | -64.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.33% | -4.96% | -88.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.06% | 2.01% | +28.05% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.57%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 0.57% | +8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.85% | 8.40% | +18.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.37% | 10.56% | +24.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.33% | 15.27% | +35.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.38% | 15.10% | +38.28% |
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.89% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and XDSQ have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.
On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.80% vs -34.89% for SPXU. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.80% return vs -34.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for SPXU and 0.79% for XDSQ.
XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer