PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXU vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.62% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.


SPXU

1D
2.06%
1M
-13.20%
YTD
-25.62%
6M
-25.04%
1Y
-48.96%
3Y*
-43.02%
5Y*
-34.89%
10Y*
-41.95%

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
-25.62%-41.73%-43.31%-46.02%36.05%-45.63%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.80%14.22%23.12%23.00%-16.78%12.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXU and XDSQ is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

-0.94

The correlation between SPXU and XDSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXU
XDSQ

Financial Services

70.6%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

SPXU
70.6%
XDSQ
11.6%

Basic Materials

SPXU

-

XDSQ
1.8%

Communication Services

SPXU

-

XDSQ
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXU

-

XDSQ
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPXU

-

XDSQ
4.9%

Energy

SPXU

-

XDSQ
3.5%

Healthcare

SPXU

-

XDSQ
8.5%

Industrials

SPXU

-

XDSQ
8.3%

Real Estate

SPXU

-

XDSQ
1.9%

Technology

SPXU

-

XDSQ
35.7%

Utilities

SPXU

-

XDSQ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXU vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXU
SPXU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXUXDSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.32

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

1.67

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

7.97

-9.60

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXU Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXU and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXUXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.39

1.52

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.70

0.65

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.84

0.69

-1.53

Drawdowns

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXUXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-26.06%

-73.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.82%

-9.60%

-41.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.36%

-19.15%

-65.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.23%

-26.06%

-64.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

0.00%

-99.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-93.33%

-4.96%

-88.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.06%

2.01%

+28.05%

Volatility

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.57%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXUXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

0.57%

+8.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.85%

8.40%

+18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.37%

10.56%

+24.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.33%

15.27%

+35.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.38%

15.10%

+38.28%

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXU has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXU vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
7.89%7.02%9.53%7.06%0.39%0.00%0.70%2.14%1.41%0.10%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXU and XDSQ have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPXU has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to XDSQ (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.80% vs -34.89% for SPXU. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.80% return vs -34.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for SPXU.

SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.93% for SPXU and 0.79% for XDSQ.

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXU and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer