SPXU vs. SPYM
SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXU tracks the S&P 500 Index (-300%) while SPYM tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXU returned -41.20%/yr vs 15.19%/yr for SPYM. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. SPXU charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
SPXU vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXU achieves a -25.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXU has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of -41.20%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.
SPXU
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- -21.86%
- YTD
- -25.00%
- 1Y
- -41.21%
- 3Y*
- -39.91%
- 5Y*
- -33.74%
- 10Y*
- -41.20%
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
SPXU vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -25.00% | -41.73% | -43.31% | -46.02% | 36.05% | -57.94% | -70.39% | -56.27% | 3.97% | -44.23% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.74% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXU and SPYM is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -0.91 |
The correlation between SPXU and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXU vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXU
SPYM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPXU
SPYM
Basic Materials
SPXU
-
SPYM
Communication Services
SPXU
-
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
SPXU
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
SPXU
-
SPYM
Energy
SPXU
-
SPYM
Healthcare
SPXU
-
SPYM
Industrials
SPXU
-
SPYM
Real Estate
SPXU
-
SPYM
Technology
SPXU
-
SPYM
Utilities
SPXU
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXU vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
SPXU
SPYM
SPXU vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.32 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 2.45 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.61 | 10.67 | -12.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXU vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXU drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXU and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -54.46% | -45.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.83% | -8.90% | -34.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -18.72% | -65.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -24.48% | -65.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.56% | -33.87% | -65.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -0.88% | -99.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -7.12% | -86.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.60% | 2.04% | +23.56% |
Volatility
SPXU vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.55%. This indicates that SPXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXU | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 3.55% | +6.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.00% | 10.00% | +20.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.51% | 12.54% | +24.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 16.92% | +33.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.33% | 17.99% | +35.34% |
SPXU vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXU has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXU vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than SPYM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 6.92% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXU and SPYM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXU has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to SPYM (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXU dropped -99.99% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.19% vs -41.20% for SPXU. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.19% return vs -41.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPXU.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 1.03% for SPYM.
SPXU tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%), while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SPXU and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXU and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer