PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXT vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 11.34%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.


SPXT

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.39%
1Y
15.02%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.34%

SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
2.70%15.10%19.93%16.23%-14.24%26.36%10.44%26.88%-7.06%16.99%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and SQQQ is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

-0.64

The correlation between SPXT and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.77 (5 years) to -0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXT
SQQQ

Financial Services

18.0%
97.1%

Communication Services

17.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%

-

Healthcare

13.5%

-

Industrials

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.3%

-

Energy

5.1%

-

Utilities

4.1%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Technology

1.0%

-

Financial Services

SPXT
18.0%
SQQQ
97.1%

Communication Services

SPXT
17.0%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXT
15.9%
SQQQ

-

Healthcare

SPXT
13.5%
SQQQ

-

Industrials

SPXT
12.2%
SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXT
7.3%
SQQQ

-

Energy

SPXT
5.1%
SQQQ

-

Utilities

SPXT
4.1%
SQQQ

-

Real Estate

SPXT
2.9%
SQQQ

-

Basic Materials

SPXT
2.8%
SQQQ

-

Technology

SPXT
1.0%
SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXT vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT
SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXTSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.72

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.99

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.32

-1.82

+10.14

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXTSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

-1.37

+2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

-0.74

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

-0.85

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

-0.88

+1.60

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXTSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.38%

-100.00%

+65.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-65.95%

+58.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-92.38%

+76.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-97.23%

+75.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.38%

-99.98%

+65.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-100.00%

+97.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-92.40%

+88.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

35.73%

-33.92%

Volatility

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 2.57%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXTSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

13.75%

-11.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

36.45%

-28.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

47.79%

-37.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

66.64%

-51.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

66.11%

-49.88%

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXT vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXT
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF
1.39%1.38%1.29%1.53%1.86%1.15%1.63%1.63%2.03%1.55%2.67%0.56%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXT and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to SPXT (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SPXT leads with 11.34% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SPXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXT has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXT has performed better with a 11.34% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 1.39% for SPXT.

SPXT is categorized as S&P 500, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.95% for SQQQ.

SPXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXT and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer