SPXT vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SPXT (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXT returned 11.43%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for NLR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

SPXT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 4.27% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 11.43%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.

SPXT

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 4.27%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: 11.43%

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	4.27%	15.10%	19.93%	16.23%	-14.24%	26.36%	10.44%	26.88%	-7.06%	16.99%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and NLR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.49

The correlation between SPXT and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXT vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXT	NLR
Financial Services	18.0%	-
Communication Services	17.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	15.9%	-
Healthcare	13.5%	-
Industrials	12.2%	15.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	-
Energy	5.1%	46.0%
Utilities	4.1%	37.4%
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.8%	-
Technology	1.0%	1.5%

Return for Risk

SPXT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT

SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 50
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPXT	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.44	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	0.90	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.10	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	0.63	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	1.41	+7.29

SPXT vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXT	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.38%	-65.05%	+30.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-29.72%	+21.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-30.48%	+14.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	-30.48%	+9.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.38%	-34.35%	-0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-25.81%	+24.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-35.70%	+31.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	13.33%	-11.50%

Volatility

SPXT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 3.19%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXT	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	13.73%	-10.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.74%	33.75%	-26.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	42.85%	-32.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.74%	29.56%	-14.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	24.22%	-7.98%

SPXT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	1.37%	1.38%	1.29%	1.53%	1.86%	1.15%	1.63%	1.63%	2.03%	1.55%	2.67%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXT and NLR in my portfolio?

SPXT and NLR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPXT or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to SPXT (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, SPXT or NLR?

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.80% vs 11.43% for SPXT. On fees, SPXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXT has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPXT or NLR?

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXT or NLR?

SPXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXT or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.37% for SPXT.

What is the main difference between SPXT and NLR?

SPXT is categorized as S&P 500, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. SPXT tracks S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXT and 0.56% for NLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.