SPXS vs. MSTZ
SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SPXS is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SPXS returned -48.73% vs 94.24% for MSTZ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXS charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXS achieves a -25.49% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -46.88% return.
SPXS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -25.49%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -48.73%
- 3Y*
- -42.68%
- 5Y*
- -34.76%
- 10Y*
- -42.01%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 14.02%
- 1M
- 86.49%
- YTD
- -46.88%
- 6M
- -23.06%
- 1Y
- 94.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -25.49% | -41.53% | -11.34% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.88% | -38.95% | -94.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXS and MSTZ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SPXS
MSTZ
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 1.12 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | 2.35 | -3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.38 | 0.68 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | -0.53 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXS drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXS and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.36% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.77% | -84.89% | +34.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -98.14% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.30% | -94.39% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.04% | 40.30% | -10.26% |
Volatility
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) is 8.51%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.49%. This indicates that SPXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXS | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 37.49% | -28.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.82% | 125.82% | -99.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.54% | 140.34% | -104.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.39% | 170.37% | -119.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.54% | 170.37% | -116.83% |
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXS has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
SPXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.91% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXS and MSTZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.49%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXS dropped -100.00% vs MSTZ's -99.36%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 94.24% vs -48.73% for SPXS. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 94.24% return vs -48.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for SPXS and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXS and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer