SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and S5EE.L (UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while S5EE.L tracks the S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXP.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for S5EE.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for S5EE.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than S5EE.L's 20.36% return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
S5EE.L
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 43.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 26.69% |
S5EE.L UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc | 20.36% | 11.67% | 20.01% | 22.12% | -9.72% | 28.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and S5EE.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and S5EE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Financial Services
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Communication Services
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Consumer Cyclical
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Healthcare
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Industrials
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Consumer Defensive
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Energy
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
-
Utilities
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
-
Real Estate
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Basic Materials
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
S5EE.L
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.66 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 5.05 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 18.93 | -3.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 3.68 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, which is greater than S5EE.L's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and S5EE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -20.25% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -8.61% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -20.25% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -20.25% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.79% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.30% | -0.37% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while UBS S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF USD acc (S5EE.L) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S5EE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | S5EE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 3.83% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 8.78% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 11.88% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 14.75% | -0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 14.63% | +1.59% |
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than S5EE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. S5EE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SPXP.L nor S5EE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and S5EE.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for S5EE.L.
SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while S5EE.L tracks S&P 500 Elite ESG Index USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.15% for S5EE.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and S5EE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer