SPXN vs. VIXM
SPXN (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF) and VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXN is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXN returned 16.26%/yr vs -11.17%/yr for VIXM. At a correlation of -0.58, they often move in opposite directions. SPXN charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for VIXM.
Performance
SPXN vs. VIXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than VIXM's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has outperformed VIXM with an annualized return of 16.26%, while VIXM has yielded a comparatively lower -11.17% annualized return.
SPXN
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 13.21%
- 1Y
- 32.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -13.49%
- 10Y*
- -11.17%
SPXN vs. VIXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 13.57% | 18.74% | 24.35% | 28.57% | -18.87% | 27.04% | 22.15% | 31.50% | -3.85% | 20.84% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 1.31% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXN and VIXM is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | -0.58 |
The correlation between SPXN and VIXM shifts across timeframes, from -0.70 (5 years) to -0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXN vs. VIXM — Risk / Return Rank
SPXN
VIXM
SPXN vs. VIXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXN | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.94 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | -0.55 | +4.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | -0.96 | +17.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXN | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | -0.44 | +3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | -0.44 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | -0.34 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | -0.55 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
SPXN vs. VIXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum VIXM drawdown of -96.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and VIXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXN | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -96.23% | +64.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.26% | -15.22% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.56% | -41.41% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.47% | -63.40% | +38.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.10% | -75.72% | +43.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -95.75% | +95.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -81.52% | +77.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 8.74% | -6.73% |
Volatility
SPXN vs. VIXM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXN | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.19% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 13.91% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 18.98% | -6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 30.68% | -13.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 32.90% | -15.26% |
SPXN vs. VIXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VIXM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXN vs. VIXM - Dividend Comparison
SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, while VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXN ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 1.35% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.76% | 1.54% | 2.60% | 0.52% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXN and VIXM have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIXM has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SPXN (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs VIXM's -96.23%.
On 10-year performance, SPXN leads with 16.26% vs -11.17% for VIXM. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 16.26% return vs -11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for VIXM.
SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while VIXM is Volatility. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.85% for VIXM.
SPXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXN and VIXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer