PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXN has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 16.26%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


SPXN

1D
-0.59%
1M
6.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
13.21%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.26%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.57%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%31.50%-3.85%20.84%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and TQQQ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015

0.79

The correlation between SPXN and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
TQQQ

Technology

41.1%
53.8%

Communication Services

13.1%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
12.3%

Healthcare

9.9%
4.2%

Industrials

9.6%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
7.7%

Energy

4.1%
0.6%

Utilities

2.7%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.1%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
TQQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
TQQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
TQQQ
0.6%

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
TQQQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
TQQQ
1.1%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.75

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

12.27

+4.16

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.92

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.43

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.69

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.74

+0.19

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-81.66%

+49.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-36.97%

+27.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-58.04%

+38.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-81.66%

+57.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

-81.66%

+49.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.76%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-18.52%

+14.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

11.28%

-9.27%

Volatility

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.16%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

13.29%

-10.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

36.04%

-26.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

47.60%

-34.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

66.53%

-49.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

65.96%

-48.32%

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPXN and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to SPXN (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 16.26% for SPXN. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer