PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.


SPXN

1D
-0.59%
1M
6.16%
YTD
13.57%
6M
13.21%
1Y
32.98%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*
16.26%

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.57%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%1.17%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and SPUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.95

The correlation between SPXN and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXN vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
SPUS

Technology

41.1%
57.3%

Communication Services

13.1%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
7.3%

Healthcare

9.9%
11.1%

Industrials

9.6%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
2.9%

Energy

4.1%
3.3%

Utilities

2.7%
0.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
SPUS
57.3%

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
SPUS
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
SPUS
7.3%

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
SPUS
11.1%

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
SPUS
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
SPUS
2.9%

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
SPUS
3.3%

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
SPUS
0.3%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
SPUS
3.0%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

SPUS

-

Real Estate

SPXN

-

SPUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.49

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.79

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

16.32

+0.11

SPXN vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.86

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.91

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, roughly equal to the maximum SPUS drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-30.80%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-10.66%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-22.82%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-28.06%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.86%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-6.21%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.47%

-0.46%

Volatility

SPXN vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.16%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

4.00%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.84%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

14.16%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

19.23%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

21.28%

-3.64%

SPXN vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SPXN and SPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to SPXN (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 14.93% for SPXN. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

SPXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer