PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXN vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXN vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXN achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 95.37% return.


SPXN

1D
0.07%
1M
5.24%
YTD
13.65%
6M
13.28%
1Y
32.97%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
16.26%

HIBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
31.17%
YTD
95.37%
6M
95.99%
1Y
276.75%
3Y*
62.38%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXN vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
13.65%18.74%24.35%28.57%-18.87%27.04%22.15%5.13%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
95.37%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%129.14%-24.96%21.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXN and HIBL is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019

0.80

The correlation between SPXN and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPXN vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXN
HIBL

Technology

41.1%
45.8%

Communication Services

13.1%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
12.9%

Healthcare

9.9%
2.9%

Industrials

9.6%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
0.6%

Energy

4.1%
2.2%

Utilities

2.7%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.1%
4.6%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

SPXN
41.1%
HIBL
45.8%

Communication Services

SPXN
13.1%
HIBL
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SPXN
11.8%
HIBL
12.9%

Healthcare

SPXN
9.9%
HIBL
2.9%

Industrials

SPXN
9.6%
HIBL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPXN
5.7%
HIBL
0.6%

Energy

SPXN
4.1%
HIBL
2.2%

Utilities

SPXN
2.7%
HIBL
3.2%

Basic Materials

SPXN
2.1%
HIBL
4.6%

Financial Services

SPXN

-

HIBL
12.5%

Real Estate

SPXN

-

HIBL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXN vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXN
SPXN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXN vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXNHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.46

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

8.88

-5.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.42

32.55

-16.13

SPXN vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXN and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXNHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

4.23

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.14

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.24

+0.68

Drawdowns

SPXN vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXN drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXN and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXNHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.10%

-88.27%

+56.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-31.39%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-69.66%

+50.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-81.58%

+57.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.70%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-44.17%

+40.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

8.55%

-6.54%

Volatility

SPXN vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is 3.09%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that SPXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXNHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

21.02%

-17.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

50.42%

-40.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

65.96%

-53.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

82.15%

-64.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

91.87%

-74.23%

SPXN vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXN has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXN vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

SPXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPXN
ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF
0.87%0.98%1.12%1.19%1.35%0.94%1.09%1.41%1.76%1.54%2.60%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXN and HIBL have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to SPXN (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXN dropped -32.10% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 5-year performance, SPXN leads with 14.95% vs 11.47% for HIBL. On fees, SPXN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXN has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPXN has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.87% for SPXN.

SPXN is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. SPXN tracks S&P 500 Ex-Financials and Real Estate Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPXN and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXN and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer