PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXM vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXM vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MOAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and MOAT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXM vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXM

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPXM vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXMMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

0.77

+0.79

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXMMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-33.31%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-4.72%

+3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-3.83%

+3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

Volatility

SPXM vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXMMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

13.86%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.18%

18.18%

-10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

18.68%

-10.50%

SPXM vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXM vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than MOAT's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXM and MOAT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Azoria and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.48% for MOAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXM and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer