SPXM vs. IBMT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) and IBMT (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Azoria, while IBMT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index. SPXM is actively managed, while IBMT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SPXM charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMT.

Performance

SPXM vs. IBMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXM vs. IBMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.27%
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF	1.28%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXM and IBMT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

SPXM vs. IBMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBMT

IBMT Risk / Return Rank: 54
IBMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IBMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IBMT Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IBMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IBMT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXM vs. IBMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPXM	IBMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.85	—

Drawdowns

SPXM vs. IBMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXM drawdown since its inception was -5.08%, which is greater than IBMT's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXM and IBMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXM	IBMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-3.18%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.58%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-0.75%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPXM	IBMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.89%	3.01%	+4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.89%	3.95%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.89%	3.95%	+3.94%

SPXM vs. IBMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXM has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMT's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXM vs. IBMT - Dividend Comparison

SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than IBMT's 3.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF	3.48%	2.98%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXM and IBMT in my portfolio?

SPXM and IBMT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPXM or IBMT?

On fees, IBMT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXM or IBMT?

IBMT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPXM or IBMT?

IBMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

What is the main difference between SPXM and IBMT?

SPXM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBMT is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Azoria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SPXM and 0.18% for IBMT.