SPXL vs. NBIG
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXL is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
SPXL vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 24.85% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 113.05% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 19.87%
- YTD
- 24.85%
- 1Y
- 55.18%
- 3Y*
- 44.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 28.72%
NBIG
- 1D
- -27.68%
- 1M
- -63.63%
- 6M
- 42.32%
- YTD
- 113.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 24.85% | 0.35% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 113.05% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and NBIG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXL vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -75.83% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -68.58% | +63.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -40.79% | +24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.77% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.68% | 204.75% | -167.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.59% | 204.75% | -154.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.38% | 204.75% | -151.37% |
SPXL vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and NBIG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer