PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXL vs. LABU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPXL vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 56.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 28.12%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -10.02% annualized return.


SPXL

1D
-0.45%
1M
-2.78%
6M
16.06%
YTD
20.43%
1Y
47.42%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
28.12%
ALL TIME*
27.27%

LABU

1D
-6.20%
1M
20.42%
6M
50.21%
YTD
56.28%
1Y
299.44%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
-27.81%
10Y*
-10.02%
ALL TIME*
-20.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXL vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
20.43%31.94%63.61%69.49%-56.55%98.75%9.64%102.80%-25.11%71.03%
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
56.28%79.17%-26.02%-13.41%-80.36%-64.15%74.66%75.50%-57.61%149.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXL and LABU is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015

0.57

The correlation between SPXL and LABU shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXL vs. LABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPXL
LABU

Technology

8.6%

-

Financial Services

2.7%
0.5%

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%

-

Healthcare

2.0%
99.5%

Industrials

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Energy

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%
0.0%

Technology

SPXL
8.6%
LABU

-

Financial Services

SPXL
2.7%
LABU
0.5%

Communication Services

SPXL
2.2%
LABU

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPXL
2.1%
LABU

-

Healthcare

SPXL
2.0%
LABU
99.5%

Industrials

SPXL
1.8%
LABU

-

Consumer Defensive

SPXL
1.0%
LABU

-

Energy

SPXL
0.7%
LABU

-

Utilities

SPXL
0.5%
LABU

-

Real Estate

SPXL
0.4%
LABU

-

Basic Materials

SPXL
0.4%
LABU
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXL vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXL
SPXL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SPXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

LABU
LABU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXL vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPXLLABUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

9.83

-8.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

26.93

-19.95

SPXL vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXL and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPXL vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and LABU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXLLABUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-99.18%

+22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.77%

-30.70%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.95%

-78.30%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.80%

-97.36%

+33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-98.96%

+22.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-94.49%

+86.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-81.79%

+65.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

11.18%

-4.38%

Volatility

SPXL vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) is 10.42%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 25.41%. This indicates that SPXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXLLABUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

25.41%

-14.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.23%

63.66%

-33.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.86%

79.41%

-41.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.54%

96.07%

-45.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.41%

95.22%

-41.81%

SPXL vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPXL vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than LABU's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LABU
Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares
0.41%0.84%0.35%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.64%0.17%
SPXL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF
0.54%0.69%0.74%0.98%0.32%0.11%0.22%0.84%1.02%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPXL and LABU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LABU has higher volatility (25.41%) compared to SPXL (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs LABU's -99.18%.

On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 28.12% vs -10.02% for LABU. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 28.12% return vs -10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for LABU.

SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.41% for LABU.

SPXL tracks S&P 500, while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.96% for LABU.

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXL and LABU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer