SPXL vs. FUTG
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXL is passively managed, while FUTG is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
SPXL vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 28.14%
- 6M
- 26.88%
- 1Y
- 81.54%
- 3Y*
- 52.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.20%
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 28.14% | 6.76% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and FUTG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
FUTG
SPXL vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.66 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -86.19% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -84.29% | +82.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -40.35% | +24.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.39% | 136.01% | -100.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 136.01% | -85.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 136.01% | -82.59% |
SPXL vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and FUTG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer