SPXL vs. FAS
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - SPXL tracks the S&P 500 while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXL returned 29.90%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for FAS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
SPXL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXL has outperformed FAS with an annualized return of 29.90%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively lower 21.20% annualized return.
SPXL
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 71.45%
- 3Y*
- 47.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.80%
- 10Y*
- 29.90%
FAS
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.20%
SPXL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.98% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -13.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and FAS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPXL and FAS has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPXL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPXL
FAS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPXL
FAS
Financial Services
SPXL
FAS
Communication Services
SPXL
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPXL
FAS
-
Healthcare
SPXL
FAS
-
Industrials
SPXL
FAS
Consumer Defensive
SPXL
FAS
-
Energy
SPXL
FAS
-
Utilities
SPXL
FAS
-
Real Estate
SPXL
FAS
-
Basic Materials
SPXL
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
FAS
SPXL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.04 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.03 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 0.08 | +10.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -91.61% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -40.88% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | -43.10% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | -66.88% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -85.99% | +9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -20.63% | +13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -31.12% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.49% | 17.97% | -11.48% |
Volatility
SPXL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a higher volatility of 13.20% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.45%. This indicates that SPXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.20% | 12.45% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 33.46% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.81% | 43.61% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.44% | 55.59% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.50% | 61.33% | -7.83% |
SPXL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than FAS's 9.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.64% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and FAS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (13.20%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXL dropped -76.86% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.90% vs 21.20% for FAS. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.90% return vs 21.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.56% for SPXL.
SPXL tracks S&P 500, while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 1.00% for FAS.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer