SPXL vs. BMNG
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXL is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.
Performance
SPXL vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 24.15% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -83.14% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 17.57%
- YTD
- 24.15%
- 1Y
- 54.60%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.30%
- 10Y*
- 28.76%
BMNG
- 1D
- -4.71%
- 1M
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -86.67%
- YTD
- -83.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 24.15% | 0.35% |
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -83.14% | -80.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and BMNG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXL vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPXL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -97.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and BMNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -97.32% | +20.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -96.86% | +91.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.07% | -83.13% | +67.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | BMNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.72% | 185.89% | -148.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 185.89% | -135.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.40% | 185.89% | -132.49% |
SPXL vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and BMNG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.75% for BMNG.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and BMNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer