SPXL vs. ABNG
SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SPXL is passively managed, while ABNG is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXL charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.
Performance
SPXL vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXL achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than ABNG's -12.31% return.
SPXL
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 28.14%
- 6M
- 26.88%
- 1Y
- 81.54%
- 3Y*
- 52.83%
- 5Y*
- 23.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.20%
ABNG
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- -12.31%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 28.14% | 6.62% |
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -12.31% | 30.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXL and ABNG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXL vs. ABNG — Risk / Return Rank
SPXL
ABNG
SPXL vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXL | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXL | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.46 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SPXL vs. ABNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXL drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than ABNG's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXL and ABNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXL | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -33.03% | -43.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -17.35% | +15.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -11.73% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | — | — |
Volatility
SPXL vs. ABNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXL | ABNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.39% | 63.13% | -27.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.24% | 63.13% | -12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.42% | 63.13% | -9.71% |
SPXL vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXL has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXL vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison
SPXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.52% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXL and ABNG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for SPXL and 0.75% for ABNG.
Find the right allocation for SPXL and ABNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer