ABNG vs. MSTU
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.
Performance
ABNG vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -70.88% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- -10.37%
- 1M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -70.88%
- 6M
- -73.38%
- 1Y
- -96.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -5.80% | 23.24% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -70.88% | -48.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and MSTU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTU
ABNG vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -99.06% | +66.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -99.06% | +87.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -72.57% | +60.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 78.30% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 44.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 114.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.20% | 142.01% | -78.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 168.53% | -105.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 168.53% | -105.33% |
ABNG vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNG vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNG nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and MSTU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.
ABNG and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ABNG and 1.05% for MSTU.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer