SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SPXD.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist) and IUMS.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - SPXD.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while IUMS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPXD.L returned 13.92%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for IUMS.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXD.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUMS.L.

Performance

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXD.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than IUMS.L's 12.52% return.

SPXD.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 11.25%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: 22.39%
• 5Y*: 13.92%
• 10Y*: —

IUMS.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 18.25%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist	10.44%	17.53%	25.57%	26.91%	-18.50%	29.67%	17.90%	13.21%
IUMS.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	12.52%	10.90%	-0.92%	12.41%	-11.90%	26.93%	20.54%	7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXD.L and IUMS.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2019	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SPXD.L and IUMS.L has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXD.L	IUMS.L
Technology	35.6%	-
Financial Services	11.8%	-
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.5%
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	91.5%

Return for Risk

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXD.L

SPXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SPXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
SPXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SPXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
SPXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IUMS.L

IUMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IUMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
IUMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IUMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	1.10	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	1.63	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.19	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	1.58	+1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	4.71	+9.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXD.L and IUMS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	1.10	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.26	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.48	+0.46

Drawdowns

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.98%, smaller than the maximum IUMS.L drawdown of -35.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXD.L and IUMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.98%	-35.81%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.35%	-11.51%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.29%	-22.80%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.17%	-25.24%	+1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-3.42%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-7.06%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	3.87%	-1.96%

Volatility

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist (SPXD.L) is 3.10%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that SPXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXD.L	IUMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	6.12%	-3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	13.40%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.46%	16.52%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	18.90%	-3.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.70%	20.07%	-2.37%

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXD.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IUMS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SPXD.L vs. IUMS.L - Dividend Comparison

SPXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while IUMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IUMS.L iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPXD.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF Dist	1.08%	1.16%	1.31%	1.51%	1.68%	1.30%	1.55%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXD.L and IUMS.L in my portfolio?

SPXD.L and IUMS.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SPXD.L or IUMS.L?

On fees, SPXD.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPXD.L or IUMS.L?

SPXD.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUMS.L.

What is the main difference between SPXD.L and IUMS.L?

SPXD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUMS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXD.L and 0.15% for IUMS.L.