PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IUMS.L (iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDUS.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - IUMS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR while IDUS.L tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUMS.L returned 4.94%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for IDUS.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUMS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IDUS.L.

Performance

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUMS.L achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than IDUS.L's 10.32% return.

IUMS.L

1D
0.77%
1M
0.62%
YTD
12.67%
6M
16.44%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
—

IDUS.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
4.43%
YTD
10.32%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
13.71%
10Y*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUMS.L
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		12.67%10.90%-0.92%12.41%-11.90%26.93%20.54%22.92%-15.68%19.22%
IDUS.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing		10.32%17.36%25.31%26.75%-18.68%29.32%17.63%30.58%-5.51%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IUMS.L and IDUS.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between IUMS.L and IDUS.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUMS.L
IDUS.L

Basic Materials

91.5%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.7%

Industrials

1.1%
7.6%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

11.2%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.3%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Basic Materials

IUMS.L
91.5%
IDUS.L
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IUMS.L
8.5%
IDUS.L
9.7%

Industrials

IUMS.L
1.1%
IDUS.L
7.6%

Communication Services

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
4.6%

Energy

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
3.3%

Financial Services

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
11.2%

Healthcare

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
8.3%

Real Estate

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
1.8%

Technology

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
38.3%

Utilities

IUMS.L

-

IDUS.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Often compared with IUMS.L:
IUMS.L vs. MXIIUMS.L vs. IEMA.LIUMS.L vs. DRIVIUMS.L vs. SPED.LIUMS.L vs. CSPX.LIUMS.L vs. DBJPIUMS.L vs. SPYL.L
Often compared with IDUS.L:
IDUS.L vs. IMSU.LIDUS.L vs. VUSD.LIDUS.L vs. CSPX.LIDUS.L vs. SPYL.LIDUS.L vs. CSPX.ASIDUS.L vs. IUUS.LIDUS.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUMS.L
IUMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IUMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
IDUS.L
IDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IUMS.LIDUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
2.41

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.75
3.52

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.44

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

14.89

-9.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUMS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the IDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUMS.L and IDUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IUMS.LIDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.41

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.86

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.94

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.61

-0.13

Drawdowns

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUMS.L drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, smaller than the maximum IDUS.L drawdown of -55.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUMS.L and IDUS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUMS.LIDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.81%

-55.48%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-8.17%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.80%

-18.48%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.24%

-24.38%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.83%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-0.57%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-8.12%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

1.89%

+1.97%

Volatility

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUMS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L) at 3.20%. This indicates that IUMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUMS.LIDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

3.20%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

8.57%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

11.73%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

16.00%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

16.33%

+3.75%

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUMS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IDUS.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUMS.L vs. IDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

IUMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDUS.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing		0.86%0.92%1.02%1.22%1.44%1.03%1.32%1.49%1.74%1.44%1.42%1.55%
IUMS.L
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUMS.L and IDUS.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUMS.L.

IUMS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Index NTR, while IDUS.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUMS.L and 0.07% for IDUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUMS.L and IDUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer