PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPX4.L vs. H50E.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPX4.L is traded in GBP, while H50E.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the H50E.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPX4.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than H50E.L's 6.58% return.


SPX4.L

1D
0.40%
1M
2.49%
YTD
13.69%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
10Y*

H50E.L

1D
0.97%
1M
5.00%
YTD
6.58%
6M
7.69%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
13.69%0.12%14.37%10.71%-1.28%
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.58%28.02%6.20%20.06%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SPX4.L and H50E.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.61

The correlation between SPX4.L and H50E.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPX4.L
SPX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

H50E.L
H50E.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
H50E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H50E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
H50E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
H50E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
H50E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPX4.LH50E.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

1.64

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

5.52

+7.45

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPX4.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the H50E.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPX4.L and H50E.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPX4.LH50E.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.25

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.39

0.00

Drawdowns

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPX4.L drawdown since its inception was -26.24%, smaller than the maximum H50E.L drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPX4.L and H50E.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPX4.LH50E.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.24%

-34.68%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-11.49%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.24%

-14.20%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-7.22%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

3.43%

-1.39%

Volatility

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF (SPX4.L) is 3.61%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that SPX4.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H50E.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPX4.LH50E.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.79%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

12.32%

-2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

15.11%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.19%

+5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.99%

+4.47%

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPX4.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than H50E.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPX4.L vs. H50E.L - Dividend Comparison

SPX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H50E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
2.45%2.46%2.98%2.92%2.77%2.01%2.05%3.04%3.50%2.76%2.79%2.63%
SPX4.L
SPDR S&P 400 US Mid Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPX4.L and H50E.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H50E.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H50E.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPX4.L.

SPX4.L is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while H50E.L is Europe Equities. SPX4.L tracks Russell Mid Cap TR USD, while H50E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPX4.L and 0.25% for H50E.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPX4.L and H50E.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer