SPVM vs. VOOV
SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while VOOV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPVM returned 11.89%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for VOOV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VOOV.
Performance
SPVM vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPVM having a 11.89% annualized return and VOOV not far behind at 11.82%.
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
VOOV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
SPVM vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.51% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPVM and VOOV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SPVM and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPVM vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPVM
VOOV
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SPVM
VOOV
Utilities
SPVM
VOOV
Energy
SPVM
VOOV
Communication Services
SPVM
VOOV
Consumer Cyclical
SPVM
VOOV
Healthcare
SPVM
VOOV
Technology
SPVM
VOOV
Consumer Defensive
SPVM
VOOV
Industrials
SPVM
VOOV
Real Estate
SPVM
VOOV
Basic Materials
SPVM
VOOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPVM vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank
SPVM
VOOV
SPVM vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPVM | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.18 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 3.04 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 3.42 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 13.04 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPVM | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.18 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.74 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.75 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SPVM vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and VOOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPVM | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -37.31% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -6.27% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -17.55% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -18.10% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -37.31% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.52% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -3.84% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.64% | +0.08% |
Volatility
SPVM vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.01%. This indicates that SPVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPVM | VOOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.01% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 7.06% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 9.83% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 14.45% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 16.95% | +2.62% |
SPVM vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPVM vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison
SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than VOOV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPVM and VOOV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPVM has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to VOOV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs VOOV's -37.31%.
On 10-year performance, SPVM leads with 11.89% vs 11.82% for VOOV. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.68% for VOOV.
SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.10% for VOOV.
SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPVM and VOOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer