SPVM vs. SMOM
SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. SPVM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
SPVM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than SMOM's 9.82% return.
SPVM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPVM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 8.29% | 6.61% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPVM and SMOM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPVM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
SPVM
SMOM
SPVM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.45 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
SPVM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -7.45% | -37.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -1.48% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility
SPVM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 12.62% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 12.62% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 12.62% | +6.95% |
SPVM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPVM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 1.91% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPVM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for SPVM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer