PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. DIPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. DIPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than DIPS's -8.73% return.


SPUT

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.80%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIPS

1D
2.87%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
-26.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUT vs. DIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and DIPS is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

-0.56

The correlation between SPUT and DIPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. DIPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DIPS
DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUT vs. DIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUTDIPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.85

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

-0.78

+5.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.62

-1.36

+23.99

SPUT vs. DIPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the DIPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and DIPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUTDIPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

-0.96

+3.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

-0.86

+2.40

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. DIPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum DIPS drawdown of -59.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and DIPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTDIPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-59.93%

+49.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-33.97%

+30.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-55.85%

+55.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-38.22%

+37.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

19.49%

-18.66%

Volatility

SPUT vs. DIPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) is 1.50%, while YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that SPUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTDIPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

10.68%

-9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

20.77%

-15.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

27.88%

-20.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

38.03%

-26.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

38.03%

-26.77%

SPUT vs. DIPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DIPS's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUT vs. DIPS - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than DIPS's 66.49% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPUT and DIPS have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to SPUT (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs DIPS's -59.93%.

On 1-year performance, SPUT leads with 18.82% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, SPUT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SPUT has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUT has performed better with a 18.82% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 5.03% for SPUT.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.99% for DIPS.

SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and DIPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer