SPUT vs. DIPS
SPUT (Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF) and DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SPUT returned 18.82% vs -26.57% for DIPS. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. SPUT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DIPS.
Performance
SPUT vs. DIPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than DIPS's -8.73% return.
SPUT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 18.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUT vs. DIPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF | 7.26% | 13.20% |
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.73% | -35.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUT and DIPS is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025 | -0.56 |
The correlation between SPUT and DIPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUT vs. DIPS — Risk / Return Rank
SPUT
DIPS
SPUT vs. DIPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUT | DIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 0.85 | +0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | -0.78 | +5.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.62 | -1.36 | +23.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUT | DIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | -0.96 | +3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | -0.86 | +2.40 |
Drawdowns
SPUT vs. DIPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum DIPS drawdown of -59.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and DIPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUT | DIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.55% | -59.93% | +49.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -33.97% | +30.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -55.85% | +55.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -38.22% | +37.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 19.49% | -18.66% |
Volatility
SPUT vs. DIPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) is 1.50%, while YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that SPUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUT | DIPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 10.68% | -9.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 20.77% | -15.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.24% | 27.88% | -20.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 38.03% | -26.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 38.03% | -26.77% |
SPUT vs. DIPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DIPS's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUT vs. DIPS - Dividend Comparison
SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than DIPS's 66.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.49% | 96.20% | 24.18% |
SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF | 5.03% | 4.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUT and DIPS have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to SPUT (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs DIPS's -59.93%.
On 1-year performance, SPUT leads with 18.82% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, SPUT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SPUT has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUT has performed better with a 18.82% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.
DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 5.03% for SPUT.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.99% for DIPS.
SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUT and DIPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer