PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.


SPUT

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.80%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUT vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and BUCK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025

0.13

SPUT vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUT
BUCK

Technology

35.7%

-

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Financial Services

11.1%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Industrials

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

SPUT
35.7%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

SPUT
11.7%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

SPUT
11.1%
BUCK
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUT
10.2%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

SPUT
8.7%
BUCK

-

Industrials

SPUT
8.4%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

SPUT
4.8%
BUCK

-

Energy

SPUT
3.6%
BUCK

-

Utilities

SPUT
2.3%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

SPUT
1.8%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

SPUT
1.8%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUT vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUTBUCKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

2.54

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

3.83

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.54

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

6.11

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.62

32.31

-9.69

SPUT vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUTBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.54

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.47

+0.07

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-5.43%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-1.31%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.04%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.49%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.25%

+0.58%

Volatility

SPUT vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that SPUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.70%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

1.53%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.24%

3.14%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

3.49%

+7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

3.49%

+7.77%

SPUT vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUT vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, less than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
SPUT
Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF
5.03%4.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUT and BUCK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUT has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, SPUT leads with 18.82% vs 7.95% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUT has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPUT.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 5.03% for SPUT.

SPUT is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.35% for BUCK.

SPUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer