PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUT vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUT vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUT achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.


SPUT

1D
0.50%
1M
0.26%
6M
6.31%
YTD
6.24%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.52%

AMDW

1D
-2.02%
1M
-10.13%
6M
119.90%
YTD
146.74%
1Y
209.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
229.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.26M$9.58M$8.51M
$131.17K$79.02K$95.99K

SPUT vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPUT and AMDW is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.53

The correlation between SPUT and AMDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUT vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUT
AMDW

Technology

38.5%
19.3%

Financial Services

10.8%

-

Communication Services

10.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Industrials

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

SPUT
38.5%
AMDW
19.3%

Financial Services

SPUT
10.8%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

SPUT
10.2%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPUT
9.8%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

SPUT
9.0%
AMDW

-

Industrials

SPUT
8.7%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

SPUT
4.4%
AMDW

-

Energy

SPUT
3.1%
AMDW

-

Utilities

SPUT
2.1%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

SPUT
1.8%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

SPUT
1.7%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUT vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPUT
SPUT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUT vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUTAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

5.83

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

11.47

-0.37

SPUT vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUT and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUT vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUT drawdown since its inception was -10.55%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUT and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUTAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-34.64%

+24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-34.64%

+30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-21.39%

+20.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-13.97%

+12.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

17.59%

-16.42%

Volatility

SPUT vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Premium Income Daily PutWrite ETF (SPUT) is 2.32%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that SPUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUTAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

28.87%

-26.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.20%

67.40%

-61.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.01%

85.70%

-77.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

85.05%

-73.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

85.05%

-73.96%

SPUT vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUT vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

SPUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPUT and AMDW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to SPUT (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUT dropped -10.55% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs 14.10% for SPUT. On fees, SPUT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SPUT has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs 14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 4.94% for SPUT.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SPUT and 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUT and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer