PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return.


SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and VT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.90

The correlation between SPUS and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUS vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUS
VT

Technology

57.3%
27.8%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
9.5%

Industrials

7.0%
12.0%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.3%

Energy

3.3%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.8%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.4%

Utilities

0.3%
2.7%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Technology

SPUS
57.3%
VT
27.8%

Healthcare

SPUS
11.1%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUS
7.3%
VT
9.5%

Industrials

SPUS
7.0%
VT
12.0%

Communication Services

SPUS
6.4%
VT
8.3%

Energy

SPUS
3.3%
VT
4.3%

Basic Materials

SPUS
3.0%
VT
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPUS
2.9%
VT
4.8%

Real Estate

SPUS
1.4%
VT
2.4%

Utilities

SPUS
0.3%
VT
2.7%

Financial Services

SPUS

-

VT
15.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUSVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.86

2.31

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

3.20

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

3.04

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.32

13.53

+2.79

SPUS vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUSVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.31

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.69

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.44

+0.48

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-50.27%

+19.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-9.67%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-16.51%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

-26.38%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.88%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-7.02%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.17%

+0.30%

Volatility

SPUS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.83%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

10.17%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

12.70%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

16.05%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

17.23%

+4.05%

SPUS vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUS and VT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 10.99% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while VT is Global Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.06% for VT.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer