PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUS vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUS vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return.


SPUS

1D
-2.44%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.02%
1Y
31.44%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
15.64%
10Y*

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUS vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
10.08%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.95%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUS and SPYM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.95

The correlation between SPUS and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUS vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUS
SPYM

Technology

61.1%
38.0%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.4%

Industrials

6.2%
8.0%

Communication Services

5.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.8%

Energy

2.7%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Utilities

0.2%
2.6%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Technology

SPUS
61.1%
SPYM
38.0%

Healthcare

SPUS
10.5%
SPYM
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUS
6.9%
SPYM
9.4%

Industrials

SPUS
6.2%
SPYM
8.0%

Communication Services

SPUS
5.9%
SPYM
10.1%

Basic Materials

SPUS
2.7%
SPYM
1.8%

Energy

SPUS
2.7%
SPYM
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

SPUS
2.7%
SPYM
4.6%

Real Estate

SPUS
1.1%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

SPUS
0.2%
SPYM
2.6%

Financial Services

SPUS

-

SPYM
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUS vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUS vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUSSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.68

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

11.98

-0.17

SPUS vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUS and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUS vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUSSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-54.46%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-8.90%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.82%

-18.72%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.06%

-24.48%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-3.14%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-7.14%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.99%

+0.68%

Volatility

SPUS vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that SPUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUSSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

4.83%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

9.83%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

12.46%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

16.90%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

18.03%

+3.30%

SPUS vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUS vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.55%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPUS and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPUS has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 15.64% vs 13.13% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.55% for SPUS.

SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUS and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer