SPUS vs. QQQ
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUS returned 15.64%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for QQQ. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SPUS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return.
SPUS
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 31.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
SPUS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 10.08% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.95% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 1.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and QQQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPUS and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUS
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Technology
SPUS
QQQ
Healthcare
SPUS
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SPUS
QQQ
Industrials
SPUS
QQQ
Communication Services
SPUS
QQQ
Basic Materials
SPUS
QQQ
Energy
SPUS
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SPUS
QQQ
Real Estate
SPUS
QQQ
Utilities
SPUS
QQQ
Financial Services
SPUS
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
QQQ
SPUS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 2.93 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 10.86 | +0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -82.97% | +52.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -11.96% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | -22.77% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -35.12% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -4.25% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -32.73% | +26.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.22% | -0.55% |
Volatility
SPUS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is 6.81%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that SPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 9.17% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 14.57% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 17.96% | -2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 22.69% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 22.42% | -1.09% |
SPUS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPUS and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to SPUS (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUS dropped -30.80% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.01% vs 15.64% for SPUS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.18% for QQQ.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUS and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer