SPUS vs. MNZL
SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) and MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPUS charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MNZL.
Performance
SPUS vs. MNZL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUS achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly lower than MNZL's 19.44% return.
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS vs. MNZL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 2.09% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 19.44% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUS and MNZL is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUS vs. MNZL — Risk / Return Rank
SPUS
MNZL
SPUS vs. MNZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUS | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUS | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 3.06 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
SPUS vs. MNZL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUS drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, which is greater than MNZL's maximum drawdown of -9.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUS and MNZL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUS | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.80% | -9.66% | -21.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | 0.00% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -1.75% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SPUS vs. MNZL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUS | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 15.71% | -1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 15.71% | +3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 15.71% | +5.57% |
SPUS vs. MNZL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUS has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MNZL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUS vs. MNZL - Dividend Comparison
SPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than MNZL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SPUS and MNZL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
SPUS is categorized as S&P 500, while MNZL is Large Cap Blend Equities. SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, while MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SP Funds and Manzil. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for SPUS and 0.40% for MNZL.
Find the right allocation for SPUS and MNZL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer