SPUC vs. BBUS
SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SPUC is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUC returned 12.76%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for BBUS. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SPUC charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
SPUC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPUC having a 10.82% return and BBUS slightly higher at 11.30%.
SPUC
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.11%
BBUS
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.15M | $23.57M | $29.57M | |
| $22.58M | $10.85M | $4.02M |
SPUC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 10.82% | 22.64% | 25.37% | 27.50% | -24.76% | 33.71% | 10.62% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 11.30% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 10.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUC and BBUS is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SPUC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPUC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUC
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SPUC
BBUS
Financial Services
SPUC
BBUS
Communication Services
SPUC
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
SPUC
BBUS
Healthcare
SPUC
BBUS
Industrials
SPUC
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
SPUC
BBUS
Energy
SPUC
BBUS
Utilities
SPUC
BBUS
Real Estate
SPUC
BBUS
Basic Materials
SPUC
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
SPUC
BBUS
SPUC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPUC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 2.46 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 10.36 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPUC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -35.35% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -9.21% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.17% | -19.01% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | -25.46% | -3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -5.38% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.18% | +1.28% |
Volatility
SPUC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.82%. This indicates that SPUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUC | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.82% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 10.23% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 12.87% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 17.17% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.33% | 19.50% | +1.83% |
SPUC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUC has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 10.99% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SPUC and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPUC has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to BBUS (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 12.76% vs 12.56% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 12.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 10.99%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPUC and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUC and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer