SPUC vs. SPD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and SPD (Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPUC returned 12.60%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for SPD. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.53% expense ratio.

Performance

SPUC vs. SPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPD's 5.43% return.

SPUC

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 1.07%
• 6M: 7.71%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.97%

SPD

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: 4.99%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 7.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	$323.51K	$320.82K	$380.59K
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF	$16.33M	$7.87M	$3.15M

SPUC vs. SPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF	9.91%	22.64%	25.37%	27.50%	-24.76%	33.71%	10.62%
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	5.43%	18.86%	17.49%	20.94%	-25.96%	24.81%	8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUC and SPD is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2020	0.91

The correlation between SPUC and SPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUC vs. SPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPUC	SPD
Technology	38.5%	38.5%
Financial Services	11.6%	11.6%
Communication Services	9.9%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.9%
Industrials	8.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.0%	3.0%
Utilities	2.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SPUC vs. SPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPUC

SPUC Risk / Return Rank: 46
SPUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SPUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SPUC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SPUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SPUC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SPD

SPD Risk / Return Rank: 31
SPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SPD Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SPD Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPUC vs. SPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPUC	SPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.80	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.21	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.14	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	0.89	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	2.80	+2.76

SPUC vs. SPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the SPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUC and SPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPUC vs. SPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than SPD's maximum drawdown of -27.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and SPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPUC	SPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.20%	-27.38%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-11.90%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.17%	-15.18%	-12.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.20%	-27.38%	-1.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-1.88%	+1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.29%	-7.56%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	3.77%	-0.31%

Volatility

SPUC vs. SPD - Volatility Comparison

Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) at 3.71%. This indicates that SPUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPUC	SPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	3.71%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	9.39%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	13.22%	+3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.96%	16.16%	+5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	15.94%	+5.39%

SPUC vs. SPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPUC and SPD have an expense ratio of 0.53%.

Dividends

SPUC vs. SPD - Dividend Comparison

SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, more than SPD's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SPD Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF	0.97%	0.97%	1.14%	1.91%	1.64%	0.88%	0.43%
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF	11.08%	7.70%	0.94%	1.33%	1.53%	2.00%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPUC and SPD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SPUC and SPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SPUC or SPD?

SPUC has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to SPD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs SPD's -27.38%.

Which ETF is better, SPUC or SPD?

On 5-year performance, SPUC leads with 12.60% vs 7.32% for SPD. Both ETFs have the same 0.53% expense ratio. On volatility, SPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPUC or SPD?

Over the 5-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 12.60% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPUC or SPD?

SPUC and SPD have the same expense ratio: 0.53% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPUC or SPD?

SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 11.08%, compared with 0.97% for SPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.