SPUC vs. AGGH
SPUC (Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPUC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPUC returned 24.38%/yr vs 4.86%/yr for AGGH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPUC charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
SPUC vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPUC achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.73% return.
SPUC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 24.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUC vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.72% | 22.64% | 25.37% | 27.50% | -16.99% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.73% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPUC and AGGH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022 | 0.12 |
SPUC vs. AGGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPUC
AGGH
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SPUC
AGGH
-
Financial Services
SPUC
AGGH
Communication Services
SPUC
AGGH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPUC
AGGH
-
Healthcare
SPUC
AGGH
-
Industrials
SPUC
AGGH
-
Consumer Defensive
SPUC
AGGH
-
Energy
SPUC
AGGH
-
Utilities
SPUC
AGGH
-
Real Estate
SPUC
AGGH
-
Basic Materials
SPUC
AGGH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPUC vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
SPUC
AGGH
SPUC vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPUC | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 2.60 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 7.58 | +1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPUC | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.15 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.28 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SPUC vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPUC drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUC and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPUC | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -13.26% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -3.10% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.17% | -8.67% | -19.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.33% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.48% | -4.45% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 1.06% | +2.36% |
Volatility
SPUC vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF (SPUC) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.55%. This indicates that SPUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPUC | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 1.55% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 3.33% | +7.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 7.11% | +9.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 8.45% | +13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 8.45% | +13.01% |
SPUC vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPUC has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPUC vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
SPUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, more than AGGH's 7.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.51% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUC Simplify US Equity PLUS Upside Convexity ETF | 9.16% | 7.70% | 0.94% | 1.33% | 1.53% | 2.00% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPUC and AGGH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUC has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to AGGH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUC dropped -29.20% vs AGGH's -13.26%.
On 3-year performance, SPUC leads with 24.38% vs 4.86% for AGGH. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AGGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPUC has performed better with a 24.38% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for SPUC.
SPUC has the higher dividend yield at 9.16%, compared with 7.51% for AGGH.
SPUC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SPUC and 0.33% for AGGH.
SPUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPUC and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer